|
S.No |
Name |
Feedback / Learning /Questions |
|
1. |
J.K.Mehta, ALERT
|
Ø
The
workshop is very useful for Chief Functionary of NGO.
Ø
How to be
accountable and transparent to Society and community.
Ø
Enhancement of organization and CEOs through fund
raising
Ø
Very
fruitful workshop |
|
2. |
AW Khan
Janpriya (U.P.) |
Ø
Very
fruitful workshop
Ø
Information Regarding Tax needs to be more elaborate
Ø
Presentation made in the workshop useful
Ø
Latest
Amendments in the fields of NGO.
|
|
3. |
Reena Banerjee
Nav Srishiti
|
Ø
Workshop
is really excellent and it has given lots of
clarity.
Ø
Next I
will make good H.R. in my CSO.
Ø
Now
without hesitation we will also ask funds for
organization.
Ø
I will
Make my CSO more accountable today
onwards.
Question: Due not having
any corpus fund we always struggle. Need your
suggestion.
|
|
4. |
R.K.Tiwari
HLFPPT
|
Investment of FCRA fund
into FD with other bank with a motive to earn handsome
interest has not been allowed under the act as
explained by the panel members of CAs
My question is whether
the above explanation is by interpretation of certain
provisions of the act or specified under any section of
the act
Feedback
Ø
This
Workshop has been good effort for making us understand
the nurturing Partnership in developing sustainable
civil societies.
The following salient
features I would like to note specially I have come to
know are:
-CSR activities
-Fund raising
-Legal provisions under
IT & FCRA Act
-Accountability &
transparency towards the different stakeholders.
|
|
5. |
Nootan Kumar |
Ø
It has
been acknowledged in the media, amongst policy makers,
academia and even in this workshop amongst CSOs that the
economic growth model simply is not resulting in the
trickle- down effect as desired .To the contrary it is
resulting in ever greater marginalization and widening
of the gap between rich and poor.
Feedback
Ø
While CSOs
are making noble efforts to fill the gap between
economic policy and its consequences, what role
can/should CSOs play in advocating to change/ replace
the economic growth/ capitalist/ industrial economic
model and policy ?
Ø
Can/Should
CSOs activate for India to step back from neo-liberal
economic globalization and explore alternative economic
models?
Question: for Ms.
Mandakini Pant (PRIA)
There remains a
strong bias favouring Western academic scholarship over
Southern academic scholarship, in terms of historical
context, concepts of dev’t, policy approaches etc. How
has this affected PRIA’s efforts in collaboration with
Uvic & IDS in creating space for Southern academic
knowledge.
|
|
6. |
HL Srivastava
GSS- Allahabad |
.
Feedback
Workshop was
very useful to us.
Ø
Presentations were very educative.
|
|
7. |
Sarita Goswami
Former Vice Prinicipal
DPS, R.K. Puram.
|
Feedback
Ø
Very will
organized
Ø
Meaningful
sessions with ample information and insights required
to run or work for a CSO/NPO.
Ø
Brilliant
panelists charged with the zeal required for a cause
like social development.
Ø
Some star
inputs were- presentations of Gen. Sandhu, Brig.
Williams and Mr. Dua.
|
|
8. |
Kajal Bansal |
Feedback
Ø
Very
fruitful workshop.
Ø
Most of
the topics which were discussed were highly useful. At
least for me as I needed clear understanding on them
|
|
9. |
Prashant Pandey
Program Officer
GCK |
Feedback
Brainstorming, very
participatory & interactive workshop
Best thing we came
to know about best practices (case studies)
developmental ICONS upcoming from same platform
Overall content of
workshop was very good especially the way all session
were designed &experts.
It will surely
help us to review back about our procedures/
practices.
|
|
10. |
Question from a Delegate |
For Mandakhani Pant
Common issues
Ø
What is
the impact of your partnership and resultant knowledge
on those who need to translate the knowledge into
practical development action?
Ø
What is
the impact of your knowledge, cohesive & comprehensive
on the common man? |
|
11. |
M. S. Rana |
Feedback
Ø
The
national workshop on Nurturing
partnership for
developing sustainable CSOs is very useful and
fruitful for me. There were various fruitful sessions
on HR management, Financial feasibility and
resource mobilization and credibility which will be
more helpful to me and
3H Project
|
|
12 |
Sheetal Dave, Deepalaya |
Feedback
Ø
Being a
new entrant in this field it was certainly a fruitful
session for me with a guidance of such senior people
Ø
I must say
the second day was much more interactive & participation
was seen.
Ø
Looking
forward for such workshop in future too?
|
|
13 |
S. C. Jain (AFPRO) |
Feedback
Ø
Question
1:- What makes media to select any issues. There are good examples
available with regard to addressing issue of water
stress through systematic intervention, but still the
conflict over the water related issues are experienced?
Why it is not in priority?
Ø
Question 2:-What
strategy should be taken-up by CSO’s to address issues
beside the one suggested by you to engage fellow
reporters? |
|
14 |
Riddhiman Bajari (SARD) |
Feedback
Ø
The
program is really good.
Ø
We got an
in-depth knowledge about the partnership and resource
mobilization. |
|
15 |
Ashok Kumar , AV Baliga
Memorial Trust |
Feedback
Ø
Can an
organization be charged for service take by funding
agency
Ø
Is PF
mandatory to be applied in organization
Ø
Overall
very useful workshop –Congratulation
Ø
Hope we
can contact you in casé of
any
organizational difficulties
Question: for all the
panelists – Tech. Ses. – I:
What were the challenges
they faced during the early years of their respective
organizations and how they tackled it.
|
|
16 |
Pradeepta Kr Nayak,
Sampradaan ICP
|
Q – (Question to Pradaan):-
Ø
what was
the thinking behind giving the name of Pradan and how
it is contributing to your vision and mission and to
sustainable partnership?
Q – (Question for Sad guru Foundation):-
Ø
Has there
been any contribution by your
communities in your 341 community lift
irrigation program ?
Ø
What are
your sources of non government support
Ø
what
challenge did you face in 1975 when
worked hard and succeeded in making some
policy changes when the government
withdrew its demand that community
should
contribute 50% of the project cost. |
|
17 |
Feed Back (Name not
given) |
Ø
All the
session planed for the workshop are well taken care,
especially resource mobilization .examples /session
taken by the org. who are doing find raising on their
own. Finance part in also good .We are looking from you
to have special workshop on H R related issues because
it is very challenging for NGO working and
sustainability point of view. |
|
18 |
Feed Back (Name not
given) |
Ø
Related
all issues are very interesting and learned about all
things.
Ø
HR Issues
are very much praised by sponsor.
Ø
CSR
related issue will require more discussion, but some
clearance required about these things to small NGO’s.
Ø
Very-very
interesting issues to sponsor relation to learn and
implement at field level.
|
|
19 |
Feedback (Name not
given) |
Ø
It was a
wonderful two days programme. It should be conducted
regularly.
Ø
It should
be more interactive.
Ø
Participants details should be shared and an e-group
formed for greater learning.
Ø
Next
session should be more focused on legal and taxation
issues.
Ø
Overall it
was a comprehensive package. Still I felt that the time
allotted was less as we could not focus more on the need
of the speakers for more time.
|
|
20 |
Feedback (Name not
given) |
Ø
Next time
would be good to have session III-V,
earlier on day one
Ø
On day two
partnership with media
Ø
HR
provides more room for actual discussion and cases.
Ø
Very good:
Papers, handouts.
|
|
21 |
Feedback (Name not
given) |
Ø
Great job
done by “Socio Research & Reform Foundation” and “SMA
Management Services (P) ltd”.
Ø
Hope to
have more such workshops in the future.
Ø
Keep it
up!!!!! |
|
22 |
Feedback (Name not
given) |
Expectations:
Ø
Formation
of e- group.
Ø
Follow up
workshop on capacity building of CSO’s on accounting
practices and standards.
Ø
Community
engagements for audit (Within the risk of perceived
threats which were discussed by Mr.SudhirVerma.)
Experience:
Ø
Lots of
working experience received.
Ø
Last
session was really useful, time was short.
|
|
23 |
C. Udayashankar
|
Ø
Educative
Ø
What next?
Ø
Plan
regional workshops
Ø
I can
assist one at Hyderabad.
|
|
24 |
Feedback (Name not
given) |
Suggestions for
future workshop:-
Ø
More
group work, energisers & participatory approach
to be adopted.
An Observation for
this workshop:-
Ø
NPO’s
working primarily on environment, water, climate,
agriculture were invited, but may be next time
organizations working on health issues should also be
called.
Ø
Proposal-
writing, though a vast topic, can still be covered on
one of the days of the next workshop.
Ø
After all,
through proposal writing skills an NPO stands to seek
business.
|
|
25 |
Feedback (Name not
given) |
Ø
The
workshop was very informative and useful.
Ø
Some
presentation on 18th Feb10 had not presented
challenges.
Ø
Sustainability towards-project organization.
Ø
Do
circulate any changes in FCRA or Societies act from the
Govt.
Ø
Please
keep updated to partners routine wise.
Ø
Last
session was very appreciable.
Ø
Thanks SMA
|
|
26 |
Feedback (Name not
given) |
Remark:-
Ø
Workshop
was informative, review the current status.
Ø
Helped to
get link with like minded people.
Ø
Circulate
all feed back & address of participants
Suggestions :-
Ø
May be
such workshop in-situ mode
Ø
More
funding partners may be called in the future workshop.
Ø
Once a
year such workshop . |
|
27 |
Feedback (Name not
given) |
Ø
Workshop
is very useful for CSOs as well as donors.
Ø
More
donors should be involved.
Ø
Such type
& workshop should be organized annually. |
|
28 |
Feed Back (Name not
given) |
Ø
Good
initiative taken for NGOs / NPOs & CSOs conducting such
type of workshop
Ø
Very good
moderators / instructors selected for the purpose.
Ø
More time
required for FCRA / Service tax /TDS act, ruling
amendments. |
|
29 |
Feed Back (Name not
given) |
Ø
All the
session planed for the workshop are well taken care,
especially resource mobilization .example /session taken
by the
Question:-.
Ø
who are
doing find raising on their own. finance part in also
good .We are looking from you to have special workshop
on H R related issues because it is very challenging for
NGO working and sustainability point of view.
|
|
30 |
Feed Back (Name not
given) |
The workshop was
learning for me. Well Done.
Question :-
Ø
With the
strengthening of I. T. laws, what are the possibilities
of retaining 12A & 80 G certificates for those NGOs who
are not directly working on the issues of Education,
Health or other welfare activities.
|
|
31. |
P. K. Dutta (AFPRO) |
Ø
This
particular workshop is focused on “Nurturing Partnership
for Developing Sustainable CSOs” but can the organizers
explore some possibilities on “How the CSOs can be made
sustainable”, e.g. organizations like Sadguru
Foundations, PRADAN or AFPRO are doing lot of good work.
Our focus is on quality work, technically sound,
socially acceptable and sustainable, but to do so, one
organization needs good quality of staff. The
administrative budget allotted in any program is always
not enough. Under such situation, how to balance the
quality of work or organisation’s reputation-this in
terms of sustainability of CSOs-what we can do? |
